Rear-End Collisions: Is It Always the Rear Driver’s Fault?
Rear-end crashes are among the most common car accidents in Las Vegas, and many people assume that the rear driver is always at fault. But that’s not always the case. Naqvi Injury Law breaks down when the rear driver isn’t responsible and what victims should know about Nevada law.
Understanding Rear-End Collisions
These accidents usually occur when a following driver crashes into the car ahead due to:
-
Distracted driving (texting, etc.)
-
Tailgating
-
Sudden braking
-
Poor weather or road conditions
While the trailing driver is typically presumed at fault, Nevada uses a comparative negligence system, meaning fault is assigned based on each party’s actions.
When the Lead Driver Might Be at Fault
In some cases, the driver in front can be found liable. Examples include:
-
Abruptly slamming on brakes without cause
-
“Brake-checking” another vehicle
-
Suddenly switching lanes without signaling
-
Driving with broken tail lights
-
Reversing into another car
Naqvi Injury Law emphasizes that every accident is unique and must be assessed based on evidence, including dash cams, witness statements, and accident reconstruction.
Why Investigation Matters
Naqvi Injury Law’s team digs deep to:
-
Gather video surveillance and witness accounts
-
Analyze vehicle damage patterns
-
Review driving records and conditions
-
Rebut assumptions that might wrongly place blame
They know how to fight back if you’re being unfairly blamed in a rear-end collision.
Don’t assume you’re at fault just because you were behind. With the right legal strategy, you can prove what really happened—and protect your rights.
Comments
Post a Comment